Initially, the Delaware Chancery Court sided with the shareholder, rescinding the entire pay package in a comprehensive ruling that emphasized the unfairness of the approval process. The court dismissed Tesla’s defense that the compensation package had been effective by driving success under Musk’s leadership, asserting instead that there was no conclusive evidence linking the grant to Tesla’s achievements. This decision created significant ripples, raising questions about corporate governance and executive compensation within high-profile enterprises. However, as time passed, a higher court overturned this Chancery Court ruling, restoring Musk’s pay package. This reversal, according to the original source, was seen as a major victory for Musk and those Tesla shareholders who had backed the original compensation package during a 2024 vote, highlighting ongoing debates over the accountability and governance of influential company boards.


Leave a Reply