In a surprising turn of events, California Governor Gavin Newsom found himself at the center of a political firestorm after calling Israel an “apartheid state” earlier this year. Newsom made the remark during a book tour, drawing criticism from pro‑Israel groups and political leaders on both sides of the aisle.
Why does this matter? Just weeks later, Newsom walked back his statement, explaining that he regretted using the term, clarifying that he was referring to a potential future scenario for Israel, not its current state. He emphasized his respect for Israel, stating, “I revere the state of Israel,” and reaffirmed his commitment to the country despite disagreements over the direction of its government.
This backpedal comes at a time when Newsom, widely viewed as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, is navigating the delicate line between supporting Israel while also expressing concern about its policies. His comments highlight the tension in U.S. politics over Israel’s treatment of Palestinians and its broader Middle Eastern strategy.
The stakes? As Newsom prepares for a possible run in the next presidential election, his stance on Israel could influence his broader political positioning—especially with voters who feel strongly about U.S. foreign policy in the Middle East.
