The GOP push forward on their plan to avoid a shutdown. Democrats aren’t sold.
Republicans moved forward Friday on their plan to avert a partial government shutdown and up the political pressure on Democrats to accept the GOP approach to a funding deadline looming in less than two weeks.
Democrats are holding government funding “hostage,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune said on the Senate floor Friday as he summarized the Republican case.
He acknowledged that Democrats can block the GOP plan, saying that now “the ball is in their court.”
Friday’s GOP effort came first with a vote in the House of Representatives. The tally there was passage by a narrow margin of 217-212 on the measure to keep the government open until Nov. 21 and provide additional millions for lawmaker security in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
It was a largely party-line vote, with Republicans Thomas Massie of Kentucky and Victoria Spartz of Indiana and Democrat Jared Golden of Maine the only lawmakers to cross party lines.
The action then quickly moved to the Senate, where two votes in rapid succession saw both the House GOP plan and a competing Democratic plan fail because of the upper chamber’s 60-vote threshold needed for passage.
For now, Democrats are united behind their different plan, with Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries saying Friday morning, “We are a hard no on the partisan Republican spending bill.”
He described the vote as a choice between the healthcare spending Democrats want to include or “bending a knee to Donald Trump.”
Read more: How a government shutdown would affect your student loans, Social Security, and more
This latest bout of back-and-forth — as markets decide whether to worry about the economic effects of a possible shutdown — comes as Congress faces a Sept. 30 deadline to either extend funding or move to a partial government shutdown.
The Democratic plan includes a longer list of priorities focused on reversing recent healthcare spending cuts that Jeffries and other leaders say need to be included to secure Democratic votes.
The bottom line — with lawmakers now headed home — is that today’s back-and-forth is set to be just a prelude to a final frenzy of talks on Sept. 29-30, when lawmakers are scheduled to return after a planned recess.
“The probability of a government shutdown has increased significantly,” Raymond James noted in a Thursday note to clients.
Markets are paying little attention so far — a pattern that has recent historical precedence.
One possible reason is that government shutdowns since 1995 have had little effect on stocks, according to a Raymond James review that even found that the S&P 500 (^GSPC) went up on average during those funding gaps.
Analyst expectations across the board say this latest round of brinkmanship is more likely to end with a shutdown than recent standoffs that began with gridlock but saw last-minute concessions.
Many are offering more or less even odds. Henrietta Treyz of Veda Partners boosted her chances of a shutdown to 45% on Thursday, with the Senate once again set to be the final arena where one side blinks or gridlock prevails.
“In the Senate, it takes 60 votes,” Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Wednesday, promising, “That means Republicans will need to work with us.”
What could be different this time is that Democrats appear willing to see a government shutdown. This would be a break from recent history, where that party has tended to offer concessions to keep the government open.
That was the case earlier this year, when another government shutdown standoff ended with Schumer being the one to offer concessions.
This time, Democratic Party leaders say it will be different, in part because of an apparent consensus among the Democratic base to accept a shutdown.
A recent survey from the progressive firm Data for Progress found that seven out of 10 Democrats support the idea of their party leaders voting for a shutdown unless Republicans make concessions.
Republicans appear equally dug in for now, with President Trump saying recently of Democrats: “Don’t even bother dealing with them.”
This story has been updated with additional developments.
Ben Werschkul is a Washington correspondent for Yahoo Finance.
Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance